Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Therapy is the current state-of-the-science-and-art of Prolotherapy. PRP Therapy has lately surfaced in the popular press as an excellent approach to treating especially-stubborn tendon sprain injuries. This advanced form of Prolotherapy consists generally of the following steps:
These injections are often guided by ultrasound imaging to direct the injection to the exact site of the tear. It was George S. Hackett and his colleagues who began asking in the 1930s how we could better treat and heal chronic sprain injuries.1 Hackett, et. al., reached out to what little was known about wound healing at the time and came up with the pragmatic realization that stimulating natural inflammation could be the answer.
We now know that traumatic wound healing or tissue regeneration occurs in four phases:
Medical science, even in Hackett’s time, recognized inflammation as the body’s normal process for initiating the healing of the physical disruption of virtually any tissue. Such “physical disruption” might be due to regular wear-and-tear, traumatic injury, infectious disease, or degenerative disease.
Thus, Hackett and colleagues surmised that injecting just a small amount of irritative substance into the location of a chronic ligament or tendon sprain injury should create an inflammatory response, which should ultimately stimulate the healing of the musculoskeletal injury. Today we know that it is not just a matter of hypothetical "should" but, in fact, it all "does" happen.
They chose glucose as a readily available, inexpensive, osmotic irritant—or “proliferant”—solution. As a result, Prolotherapists have been regenerating injured ligament and tendon tissue and healing chronic sprain pain and dysfunction in that fashion ever since. Now, what does all of that Prolotherapy history and basic science have to do with Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy or PRP?
Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Therapy is a particularly hot topic, nowadays—in the laboratory, the clinic, and on the street. A very recent New York Times (NYT) article describes how two Pittsburg Steelers “used their own blood in an innovative injury treatment before winning the Super Bowl.”4 The article goes on to cite several other sports figures who have also been successfully treated in this fashion. It refers to PRP Therapy as a means of delivering a “growth-factor cocktail” to such injuries as “tennis elbow” or “knee tendin(osis)."
It is gratifying—if not somewhat humorous—that the advocates for this “new” PRP treatment describe how this “nonsurgical” therapy works by using “the body’s own cells to help it heal”—as if Prolotherapists have not been doing exactly the same thing since the mid-1930’s. And the same PRP advocates tout their noninvasive technique du jour as providing better cost-effectiveness compared to surgery, thereby making PRP Therapy hugely attractive for preferential insurance reimbursement—while standard Prolotherapy remains non-reimbursed by most healthcare insurance programs!
The truth of the matter is that Prolotherapists have been using the earliest version of PRP Therapy for years—achieving all of PRP Therapy’s basic positive attributes, albeit less potent to some degree but at a very small fraction of the cost.
The NYT article goes on to say that PRP Therapy “has the potential to revolutionize not just sports medicine but all of orthopedics”—possibly “obviating surgery and shortening rehabilitation.” Isn’t that one reason why Prolotherapists have been calling our style of practice “Orthopedic Medicine”: treating joint injury and dysfunction while protecting our patients, whenever possible, from more invasive, expensive, and potentially debilitating orthopedic surgery by using the nonsurgical, regenerative approach of Prolotherapy?
It is obvious that PRP Therapy is a logically next progression toward perfecting the Hackett technique for repairing extremely recalcitrant, severe ligament and tendon tear injury. And PRP Therapy may be just technically attractive enough to catch the public’s, the physician’s (medical, osteopathic, and surgical), the dentist’s, the veterinarian’s—and the insurance company’s eye—finally!
Rabago, D. et. al., described a systematic review of the efficacy of four therapies for lateral epicondylosis (i.e., “tennis elbow” or sprain injury of the proximal tendon of the radial extensor muscle of the forearm).5 Those four therapies—including Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy—are, very basically, four different types of therapy delivery systems. Each system delivers a growth factor or other therapeutic agent of some form to the injured tendon.
And, when those 2-3 cc of PRP are injected into the patient's tendon or ligament injury site, a multitude of growth factors are directly delivered to facilitate the healing of even sizeable musculoskeletal tears. Contact For further information on Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy as provided by BOULDER PROLOTHERAPY, please contact us. References: 1. Hackett GS, Hemwall GA and Montgomery GA. Ligament and Tendon Relaxation Treated by Prolotherapy. 5th ed. Beulah Land Press, Oak Park, IL, 2002.
2. The Medical Biochemistry Page. www.themedicalbiochemistrypage.org 3. www.ganfyd.org. A free medical knowledge base. 4. Schwarz A. A promising treatment for athletes, in blood. The New York Times, Sports Section, p A1, Feb 17, 2009. 5. Rabago D, et al. The systematic review of four injection therapies for lateral epicondylosis: prolotherapy, polidocanol, whole blood and platelet rich plasma. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2009 Jan 21. [Epub ahead of print] |